|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 31 post(s) |
Im Super Gay
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 21:53:00 -
[1]
Its clear to me now, CCP wants to turn all of 0.0 into NPC 0.0. Apparently you're supposed to drop a **** ton of isk on sov bills to have space that is no better than NPC 0.0.
|
Im Super Gay
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 22:10:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Samuel Miner
Originally by: Starkiller Adams for the love of god leave 0.0 alone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LEAVE SOMETHING CONSTANT U WILL NEVER SEE WHAT WORK IF UR ALWAYS ****ING CHANGING ****!!!!
This made me lol
CCP is notoriously slow as hell at changing anything. Thorax with 5 heavy drones, that only took 3 years to get nerfed. Then they thought a tech 1 battlecruiser with 5 heavy drones would be okay, that took another year to get nerfed.
CCP seems hell bent on turning all 0.0 into NPC 0.0 now though...
|
Im Super Gay
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 22:25:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Kalissa All these tears over jump bridges. I've been playing Eve since '03 long before JB's were in the game and most of the people here are all moaning and groaning about the the fact you'll actually have to do some gate travel and actually *shock* TAKE A RISK!!
Stop crying like little girls, take it on the chin. Null sec is supposed to be risky thats the whole point.
And yes I do use JB's and it WILL make my life harder, but I fully support the changes.
Risk vs. Reward. With the anom nerf and now the impending jump bridge nerf, CCP has made 0.0 more risky and less rewarding. Why does anyone bother to live in 0.0 these days?
|
Im Super Gay
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 22:34:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Zamiq
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Originally by: Ay Liz F On to the great plan you have. Like others already pointed out, we haven't seen your outline for 0.0 and only see you taking away things that make our lives easier. Maybe you should add something new.. Incentives to live in 0.0 as you called it. Taking away all the good stuff (anomalies, now convenient JB networks) and making our lives miserable until you decide to add something new in 2 years doesn't sound very appealing to anyone.
Won't be two years. You'll hear the early parts of it before this month is up.
Hear being the key word. We wont actual see it for two years if ever. Half your content is either undeveloped or underdeveloped.
The other half is nerfs to the stuff that isn't actually broken.
|
Im Super Gay
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 22:43:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Alty McExpendable BOOST SUPERCAPITALS
NERF RAILGUNS
Hurr I'm CCP
not emptyquoting
|
Im Super Gay
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 22:52:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Cellistara
Not bloody likely. If anything you'll announce you're removing sov altogether.
Might as well, what benefit of paying for ****ty anoms is there over NPC 0.0 ayway?
|
Im Super Gay
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 23:30:00 -
[7]
Originally by: StuRyan Nerf 0.0 by Nerfing ISK making opportunities and now Nerf how people move around 0.0 and in general how Jita will be seeded once people go **** that.
JEEEEEZE do you actually want people to live in 0.0?
Based on the recent and upcoming 0.0 changes, CCP doesn't want people to live in 0.0.
While we're at it lets remove warp to 0 to increase pvp opportunities.
|
Im Super Gay
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 23:39:00 -
[8]
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Jumpbridges were an original part of the little things, far before we got the go-ahead for a 0.0 review. They're also really time sensitive (need time to reconfigure the networks). It also functions independently, compared to many other larger changes.
Announce this 1 week before the winter patches then
|
Im Super Gay
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 00:25:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Lord's Servant
1. Industrialists and carebears only belong in 0.0 as renters(duh). Renters should rent from a solid pvp alliance, who should be able to protect them should any major issues come up. This is both a boost to small gang pvp, and a minor nerf to cynojammers/turtling. Nothing more, nothing less.
Because there's nothing more boring than mining than watching people mine...
|
|
|
|